I agree with maum. If it were just the pacifier in isolation, then maybe okay, but it isn't.

The pacifier indicates two things to me. Firstly, she is not told no. Even if someone has tried to wean her off it, it hasn't been successful, which indicates she 'won'. Or she's simply been allowed to continue with it until she tires of it. Both of my kids were weaned off their pacifiers at age two. We had a little ceremony where each of them threw it in the rubbish bin and the contents of the rubbish bag were then put in the big bin in front of them. They understood it was 'gone' and not coming back. We didn't have any problems with either of them.

More disturbingly to me, it indicates that she is not socialised with other children.  Kids are lttle sponges who learn appropriate behaviour from their parents, teachers and peers. If she were around other children her age, she would soon see that they are not using pacifiers. Kids that age want to be just like everyone else. She would eventually stop using it.

Poor little rich girl indeed. I do find it interesting that she was allowed to be photographed so publicly with it.

Never discuss Scientology with the critic. Just discuss his or her crimes, known and unknown. And act completely confident that those crimes exist. Because they do.

L. Ron Hubbard